Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eboy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 05:41, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Eboy

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Looks like wikispam; unreferenced, and poor claim of web notability. With half a million Google hits for "eboy", finding references shouldn't be a problem, right?--Stratadrake 12:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep extremely notable commercial art group, plenty of big-name clients, etc. Their work has also been collected as a book (ISBN 1856693031). Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:51, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep quite notable per Andrew, I have his art above my cubicle right now, and nothing gets on my cubicle if its not notable. hateless 21:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.