Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eccpasian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Sr13 23:48, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Eccpasian

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A constructed language with allegedly 10 speakers that makes no attempt to assert notability. No references of any kind. Were this a corp or person, it would be clear CSD A7. Only three ghits, all of them WP mirrors. Contested prod. Delete Aagtbdfoua 12:33, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No WP:RS. Should be speedy as WP:NONSENSE. It is complete bollocks. --Evb-wiki 12:42, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unsourced, nonsense page PGWG 15:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No claim of notability. -- Schaefer (talk) 21:00, 7 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Mattinbgn/talk 20:38, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Not one independent Ghit, everything points back to this page. Orderinchaos 23:11, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, no assertion of notability (and seems to fall into a loophole in CSD A7), and a pile of original research on top of it. --Wingsandsword 03:18, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 04:09, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to BJAODN. John Vandenberg 04:10, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete This "language" is basically Serbian grammar and standard forms with some bastardised random other thrown in (mornos? evnos?). Several of the letters are Serbian, one or two are Greek, and still others have no clear derivation and could not be reproduced in Unicode. With clearly no references independent of *this article* let alone the subject, smells like something thought up in school one day to me, and most probably complete bollocks. Zivko85 16:06, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I'm going to create a language that just involves grunting and pointing at things. ~ Infrangible 01:51, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Idle comment At least it will most likely have more than 10 speakers, and even has border-crossing potential. :) Orderinchaos 21:19, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-notable conlang. Lankiveil 05:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete nn. JJL 23:30, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.