Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EchoMail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 00:19, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

EchoMail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No real third party coverage. The company receives passing mention in a long interview with the founder and in a boston magazine article on the controversy over him "inventing email" (link is dead in the article, here it is). The CSMonitor source doesn't talk about the company at all. The remainder of the sources linked in the article are on tangential topics or cover the technologies which echomail used (not their use by EchoMail). Protonk (talk) 14:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "invented email" is a joke. echomail=email - got it? -No.Altenmann >t 15:07, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. &mdash;  Ascii002 Talk Contribs GuestBook 15:49, 11 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - software company of unclear notability; per nom, mentions of the company are passing and not significant coverage, and several sources do not even mention the company. The extant Shiva Ayyadurai article covers the controversy over the invention claim, and notability is not inherited.Dialectric (talk) 02:04, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Barte (talk) 22:00, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.