Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eclectic Horseman Magazine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:35, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Eclectic Horseman Magazine

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non notable magazine. No independent, reliable sources giving significant coverage that I could find. Prod was removed. Dana boomer (talk) 14:20, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Support Appears to be small regionally-based publication. Montanabw (talk) 00:15, 21 December 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Support deletion. You will note that the total absence of any interest whatsoever speaks volumes. I've been trying to dump this thing for months. Why is it even being relisted? Montanabw (talk) 18:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong KEEP. It's a legitimate magazine with 159,000 GHits. Qworty (talk) 19:20, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * see WP:GOOGLEHITS. The number means little. LibStar (talk) 09:50, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Legitimate does not always (or even often) equal notable, and neither does a google search that turns up the name. (I'm only getting 67K hits with "eclectic horseman magazine" in quotations, but that's beside the point). How many reliable, third party sources did you find in those 159K hits, that weren't to the magazine itself, advertisements, forum sites or facebook pages? If you can find me multiple (at least two) reliable sources that give more than a passing mention of this magazine, then I will agree with you that it should be kept. Dana boomer (talk) 22:00, 29 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Strong delete google news turns up nothing. Could not find any reliable sources. LibStar (talk) 09:53, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.