Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eclipse Eternal


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 08:51, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Eclipse Eternal

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BAND, and the sources provided do not prove the article's notability. Source 2 is an interview/advert, and source 3 is passing coverage. Source 1 alone is not enough to establish notability as a review of the band. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Utopes (talk / cont) 02:46, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete: per the nom, only one of the articles qualifies to establish notability per WP:BAND, which is not enough. Also, I cannot find any other mentions in any of the reliable sources from WP:MUSIC/SOURCES.  Bait30   Talk? 04:51, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CASSIOPEIA(talk) 06:17, 2 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete - Over the many years of their existence it looks like they only got one reliable album review (already cited in the article), and otherwise they seem to have received very little reliable and significant coverage beyond brief gig announcements. The articles at the "Brave Words" site (also already cited in the article) appear to be self-written attempts at promotion. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.