Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eclipsia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 22:02, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

Eclipsia

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Seemingly non-notable book, author is currently nominated for speedy. Cycle~ (talk) 19:18, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable per WP:BK.  Has a few google hits, but only because it has been submitted to free classified sites and self-publishing outfits like LuLu.com.  I think this is a textbook example of vanispamcruftisement. --Dawn Bard (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  21:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions.   -- the wub  "?!"  21:14, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is not WikiBooks. Spiesr (talk) 21:15, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Never heard of it. Oops, sorry, that's not a policy argument. But hardly anyone else seems to have heard of it either. I've looked in the usual places for SF books, no joy. Self-published, not notable, and could have been speedied as blatant advertising. dougweller (talk) 22:07, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:BK. Schuym1 (talk) 22:08, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Self published fiction is almost never notable, and I see no evidence that this book is the exception. JulesH (talk) 09:00, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete self published on Lulu, not notable. Shsilver (talk) 16:40, 22 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.