Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco-Social Democracy

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete. &mdash; Xezbeth 14:57, May 14, 2005 (UTC)

Eco-Social Democracy
It's an extremely limited neologism: 2 web hits for eco-social democracy, 1 for eco-social democratic that isn't one person's personal ad, and nothing for eco-social democrat. The only inbounds are redirects Eco-Social Democratic and Eco-Social Democrat created by the same author. That author, User:Michaelm, has been part of a continuing series of disputes as he has edited politicians and political parties to attach his own idiosyncratic labels without explanation or against consensus. User talk:Michaelm, Requests for comment/Michaelm, Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Michaelm. Obviously the current claim of the article, that it "is part of the big role of the Greens", is not supported and could only be argued with original research. Samaritan 18:26, 7 May 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete. --Spinboy 20:00, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Bye-bye. hydnjo talk 02:41, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, neologistic entry by problematic user. Slac speak up!  09:02, 8 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Samaritan. Ground Zero 15:33, 9 May 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Samaritan. Shall we call this Greencruft? --Deathphoenix 03:51, 13 May 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.