Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EcoMobility


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Global Alliance for EcoMobility. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:13, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

EcoMobility

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability and better covered in Sustainable transport Darrelljon (talk) 21:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:56, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Sustainable transport or ICLEI. The article mainly talks about an ICLEI project. Both references in the article are deadlinks.Trimton (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kieran207 ( talk - Contribs ) 22:44, 31 March 2021 (UTC) *Merge with Sustainable transport. Mccapra (talk) 04:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Could the participants proposing to merge clarify what content from EcoMobility they think should go into Sustainable transport and why? All the external links and detail about various conferences and such don't belong in Sustainable transport. Even the definition is not supported by reliable sources currently. Adumbrativus (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Global Alliance for EcoMobility which states "Currently the word 'EcoMobility' is still a rarely used term" followed by a couple of usage examples which aren't supported by the sources provided. It's a non-notable neologism that hasn't received significant adoption outside of this organisation.Pontificalibus 14:58, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Pontificalibus Mccapra (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
 * For some reason I don't understand, the talk page already redirects there.--Darrelljon (talk) 22:55, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to an appropriate target in the best judgement of the closing admin. Bearian (talk) 18:08, 7 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.