Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Driving


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 07:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Eco Driving

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unencyclopedic, no real content. I can't find any verbatim google references, but I don't think it's notable. Shadowjams (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - Poor article at the moment, but plenty of potential here. I think this is a notable issue, and on a very quick search I found this article. I know I will be able to find more. --Korruski (talk) 12:48, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors - Wasn't aware of this article before. I agree this would be a better option, as eco-driving seems to me to be more or less synonymous with it. --Korruski (talk) 08:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete or redirect to Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors (as with Eco-driving already). Title doesn't conform to MoS, reads as an advert rather than an encyclopedia article, would need a fundamental rewrite to be encyclopedic.  Even if it were rewritten, it would probably just duplicate information in that article. -- Smjg (talk) 16:35, 10 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per WP:NOTHOWTO. The topic is properly covered under the encyclopedic subject of Hypermiling. Fuel economy-maximizing behaviors should be deleted on the same basis. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 02:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Non-encyclopaedic article. Not worth redirecting, unless there ate links to it.  If kept it should be renamed to Eco-driving, since Eco is not a word on its own.  Peterkingiron (talk) 22:01, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.