Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eco Eye


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Due to lack of participation with no prejudice to a speedy renomination Davewild (talk) 20:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Eco Eye

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No significance asserted. Sourced only to the network's website and Facebook. Greykit (talk) 16:38, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:56, 8 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - While the article doesn't assert itself or cite significant resources, there is some amount of coverage out there, but is it significant enough? Also, it's beaten out by another "Eco-eye" when you search 'eco eye' without quotations, and "eye eco" comes up before it as well. 1 2 3 4 5 Upjav (talk) 21:15, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Sam Sailor Talk! 23:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Note that, of the five sources above, the first two have the same publisher (Independent News & Media). The fourth one mentions Eco Eye along with another show, which takes up half of it. The third and fifth one are about the same incident - perhaps that could be covered in the presenter's article if nothing further turns up? --Greykit (talk) 21:57, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note that, much more importantly, the first source is actually written by the show's presenter and reads like that ("In our current Eco Eye TV series", "We so far have featured three episodes", "Our next 'Eco Eye' is Tuesday, January 27", "you can access our previous Eco Eye episodes"). --Greykit (talk) 21:58, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 01:15, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.