Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecocho


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (Non-admin closure). The reason given in the nomination does not apply (site is still active) and nobody else has argued for deletion, while some have argued to keep. It is also worth noting that even if the site were no longer active it is not clear that would be a reason for deletion: we have articles on many historical topics. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:07, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

Ecocho

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

Both links at the bottom of entry are not working. The link at the bottom of the page to Ecocho.com does not return anything as the domain seems not to exist anymore. Without the website existing anymore, anyone opposes the deletion? (The article also seems to have been spammed by Forestle already). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Azthral (talk • contribs) 2010/04/24 18:10:15
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 10:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:40, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, the links all work for me. -- Nuujinn (talk) 18:33, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep, it is an active website with significant coverage in reliable sources.  GB fan  talk 01:31, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Follow procedure for orphaned articles under WP:ORPHAN.T3h 1337 b0y (talk) 01:37, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.