Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecodestrian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. PhilKnight (talk) 18:26, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Ecodestrian

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Yet another protologism that somebody is trying to spread through Wikipedia. Delete.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 20:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:NEOs are one thing, but they have to work harder than this article to have a chance of surviving. References! Andy Dingley (talk) 20:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Gets 2 ghits. Let's call it, "wasting other people's time and resources to promote yourself and your own ideas", or "Wastaggrandizement". Brianyoumans (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete this unverified, unsourced protologism. Cliff smith  talk  22:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - this is pure madeup, unverifiable original research with not even a hint of notability or any reliable sources that discuss it. -- Scjessey (talk) 23:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:BOLLOCKS.-- S Marshall  Talk / Cont  23:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete junk. Environment-friendly junk, but junk all the same. JuJube (talk) 03:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete under WP:BALLS this is made up nonsense. JBsupreme (talk) 07:00, 13 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I think that the Ecodestrian Events are going on at the Olympics right now!! Mandsford (talk) 20:55, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.