Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecogen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:20, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Ecogen

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Probably fails WP:N and is therefore advertising/promo rather than useful article. A Guy into Books (talk) 22:20, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:26, 25 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails GNG, references fail as PRIMARY or fail WP:CORPDEPTH. No indications of notability. -- HighKing ++ 14:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: no indication of corporate notability. No coverage in independent, reliable sources.    Dr Strauss   talk   15:34, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Nope, not an encyclopedia article yet. Rhadow (talk) 20:51, 1 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.