Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecolig


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 15:26, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Ecolig

 * – (View AfD (View log  •  AfD statistics)

Disputed prod, seems to be original research. The article does not evidence or assert notability, nor have I found any via the web. There is a paper on the subject Ecolig - A semiotic protocol that uses neuroheadsets and CP-Nets; one of the authors of that paper appears to be the author of this article. The article may have been created in order to give greater credence to the paper. The article may consist of the contents of the paper for all I know, I haven't seen it. pablo hablo. 22:02, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions.  --   pablo hablo. 22:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  --   pablo hablo. 22:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Conflict of interest troubling. I would say delete because of that. Qwerty786 (talk) 22:18, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice against recreating in the future. Like Pablo, I can find only one article mentioning the concept. (Not to be confused with EcoLig, which appears to be either a bacterium or a protein produced by bacteria.) That paper is not identical to the Wikipedia article, but it is co-authored by Paulo Miguel, perhaps the same person who created the page. This bumps up uncomfortably against WP:COI, WP:OR, and possibly WP:FRINGE. At any rate, it is not currently notable. Cnilep (talk) 22:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep I believe the concept is new but very useful concerning the technologies being developed around the interaction between human and computers. The main reason for not finding more information about it, in my opinion, is probably the fact that the concept is being stablished recently —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rodrigo im (talk • contribs) 23:27, 9 December 2009 (UTC)  — Rodrigo im (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Not currently notable; neologism, borderline WP:OR. - Running On Brains (talk) 05:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is so confused as to defy any reasonable attempt to make sense of it, a typical blend of cod philosophy and cyber-utopianism: a communication protocol that lies at the study of both communication and signification in the human and environment through electronic world. Supported by concepts as Umwelt from Uexküll theorised that organisms can have different "Umwelteen", even though they share the same environment. The human perception, as part of the cognition process, can use the third wave of Human-Computer Interface, those devices can use high-spatial density array EEG, MEG and fMRI, for example, or even other signal processing techniques... - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:39, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete After reading it carefully, I have come to the conclusion that a) it's badly written b) it does not seem to be notable c) it's research that has not seen enough references to be important enough to be in the wikipedia d) it doesn't seem to be very much point to have here right now- it's basic research that is unlikely to be read by the users of the wikipedia.- Wolfkeeper  06:41, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep In my opinion, it is a great work. All objections should be done in order to improve it and really add some value to Wikipedia project. A technical background can help someone to understand it deeply. By the way, a professional comment about notability should explain the criteria. An important Wikipedia Project contribution is the ability to shows up new terminologies and technologies in Internet speed. The Semiotic concepts and Artificial Intelligence has been strongly improved with several innovations in the Human Computer Interaction. This article describes the concepts of a new protocol to improve the human computer communication, what means a break through with old paradigms as mouses, displays and keyboards, as well as wheels steering car and other mechanical tools. Therefore I strongly recommend keep this amazing contribution to Wikipedia project. Samiplis (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC) — Samiplis (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete Completey unsourced, can't even verify that the word/concept exists. --MelanieN (talk) 06:56, 15 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN
 * Keep Science has to be openmind; Ecolig seems to be a new approach for the old HMI (human-machine-interface) questions, that shall be kept in a wide discussion forum. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arevian (talk • contribs) 11:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC)  — Arevian (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.