Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecomagic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. Paul August &#9742; 18:41, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Ecomagic
I have been unable to verify the concept behind this article. A google search returns only 274 non-duplicative hits, many of them being Wikipedia clones. The rest appear to be blogs and personal websites. Google is not everything but absent some form of independent verification, I think we have to nominate it for deletion. Rossami (talk) 16:34, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep a fairly superficial view of some of the sites on Google shows that "ecomagicians" apparently have their own organization: the Dragon Environmental Network. It is a fringe group, but wikipedia is full of similar fringe belief articles.  It's an overly vague stub thought that could stand a cleanup... even if it is just a better written and defined stub.--Isotope23 17:45, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Not an established term. Groeck 18:02, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless a substantial amount of material is added during term of vfd. Currently its only a definition.  Dlyons493 20:47, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Dicdef. TheMadBaron 02:26, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Wiktionary. Owen&times; &#9742;  11:45, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Jwissick 17:22, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.