Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EconJobRumors


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 13:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

EconJobRumors

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Nothing actually suggestive of the needed independent notability and my searches have found nothing better at all, the apparent best source is NYTimes but it never actually mentions this by name. SwisterTwister  talk  00:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  00:56, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  14:43, 19 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &mdash; Music1201  talk  17:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. referred to a very few times, but not notable.  DGG ( talk ) 02:34, 4 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.