Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Econoception


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 01:14, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Econoception

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prod. Neologism. Single source. One google hit. Possible COI (see OE username). Wperdue (talk) 16:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO - and per WP:NFT, the article admits the word was "first coined" only yesterday! JohnCD (talk) 16:58, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete - only two Google hits, one of which is this article. . .Rcawsey (talk) 18:02, 17 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete as a copyright violation from http://www.econoception.com/ and tagged as such. -- Whpq (talk) 19:07, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, from his comment on the AfD talk page, that website was set up by the author after he input the article and found it was likely to be deleted, so I don't think it is a copyvio. Tag removed. JohnCD (talk) 19:12, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply - in which case the author is in violation of copyright as the material sports no GFDL license or credit to Wikipedia. But in any case, I still maintain deletion is in order as original research amongst its many problems. -- Whpq (talk) 20:13, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * According to WP:Copyrights, if you contribute something you wrote yourself "you retain copyright to your materials. Copyright is never transferred to Wikipedia. You can later republish and relicense them in any way you like." Yes, it should certainly go, but I don't think it's speediable. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Reply - Oops! You are right!  I stand corrected.  But it's still a delete. -- Whpq (talk) 20:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.