Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic Militarism

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. I count 2 delete and 4 keep (from 2 keep and 2 redirect & keep). Deathphoenix 18:59, 10 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Economic Militarism
Seemingly neologistic term that doesn't google, and the article seems a bit propagandistic in nature. Keep or cut? Radiant! 15:58, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be a neologism as it only gets 50 Google hits. - SimonP 17:02, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Madeup neologism. &mdash;Lowellian (talk) 22:21, Feb 23, 2005 (UTC)
 * Plainly not a neologism. The Google hits contain several references to a book called Germany Rampant: A Study in Economic Militarism written in 1939, for example. The Google hits look fairly scholarly. Perhaps just replace with a stub? Pcb21| Pete 22:44, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * If it's a real term then redirect to war economy. Gazpacho 00:14, 24 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Well, I guess nobody can really call it a neologism if it's been around since 1939, but even so, it seems to barely be used outside of that one book (and its article). I wonder if there's a term for words that never took off... "nonstarterism" perhaps.  In any case, I support a redirect as above. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd  01:15, Feb 24, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but rewrite economic militarism has been used in a few generally read articles. Stirling Newberry 17:52, 27 Feb 2005 (UTC) (Rewrite attempted).

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.