Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economic stratification


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep. Eluchil404 (talk) 05:39, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

Economic stratification

 * – ( View AfD View log )

It has had no souces since 2009 which suggests it is not important enough to improve or is unverifiable. Perhaps merge the information if sources are found otherwise it should be deleted Brad7777 (talk) 02:42, 4 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep. Lack of sources is not a reason for deletion, and the deletion rationale does not appear to show evidence of "thorough attempts to find reliable sources" as required by WP:DEL.  A trivial google scholar search turns up thousands of potential sources.  These seem to establish notability, and the article could in principle (if necessary) be rewritten from any number of such sources.   Sławomir Biały  (talk) 03:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep per Sławomir Biały. --Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 03:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep or maybe redirect, as this seems like a topic that would have already been covered elsewhere, but I don't see a good redirect location.AerobicFox (talk) 03:59, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Appears to be distinct from economic inequality. Sławomir hit the nail on the head, just needs work. --Pusillanimous 19:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  — Frankie (talk) 17:19, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.