Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior-Protecting America's Abused Children


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  18:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior-Protecting America's Abused Children
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This article was started with the name of an organization, "Protecting America's Abused Children". The creator has moved it, but it is still mainly about the organization, which is doing a research project that now forms the title of the article. Either way, there is a complete lack of notability here. Article creator has removed the prod but has not responded directly to the request to produce references to establish notability. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 23:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * There seems to be an appearence of stalking and harrassing by you and you only. There has been an effort to adapt to your concerns as expressed on the talk page. The subject of the article is one thing which the title can be changed if that is what you want..I have asked you to advise without response in regards to broadening the subject by changing the title.


 * 'Protecting America's Abused Children' is both an organization and a social concern within the study.


 * As an organization, 'Protecting America's Abused Children' is one of many organizations researching around behavioral economics and indigence some of which are referenced in the article.


 * I encourage others to contribute to the subject, but how can anyone contribute if you continue to obstruct any progress?Other research studies by organizations and contributions relevant to the 'Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior' and protecting America's abused children and solving the problem associated with the issues are more than welcome as they should be.


 * If for the reasons you intially expressed until 'notable' change have been made it is boing down to what can or cannot acceptable in your opinion.


 * Rather than play games in response to trying to comply with your concerns by throwing up barriers, why don't you make a constructive suggestion for resolving your problem?


 * Please consult with others and advise as to what would be acceptable for the benefit of the subject.


 * If you can not advise constructively, and you arbitrarily delete the article despite trying to resolve this matter because you can you and your actions need to be thorughly investigated.


 * As said before, I am trying to work with you...not play games! Please advise as requested.


 * --Nvkorruption (talk) 23:56, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Don't worry, I can't arbitrarily/unilaterally delete the article. Others will show up here at some point. Please don't delete content of this page.  If you want to withdraw your contributions (not those of others), you can strike them, like this (click edit to view code). Nomoskedasticity (talk) 08:46, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:25, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  —Nomoskedasticity (talk) 10:27, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:00, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. I don't see how this is a notable concept at all (besides it being an awkward search term in the first place). I cannot find any relevant hits--though that seems, initially, difficult to judge since there are a couple of very frequently occurring terms in the phrase. But there are no references to this article at all (except for one dictionary definition--and I know what "indigence" means, thanks--and one link to an article about growth and poverty), and the article reads like a brochure by an advocacy group. The use of the phrase as a "research term" is not verified by citing a single research paper that uses it as a research term: the only occurrence of the phrase (with quotes) on the entire World Wide Web is this WP article. Drmies (talk) 01:23, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's a wretched-written under-referenced essay about a non-notable organization and a neologistic term. Majoreditor (talk) 03:41, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Firstly, Wikipedia isn't a repository for research papers. Secondly, the phrase Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior-Protecting America's Abused Children doesn't exist anywhere on Google expect for this article; neither does Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior. The article states that this is a research term, but as far as I can see, none of the sources use it. Whilst Google isn't the be-all and end-all of searching, especially academia, the lack of sources provided by the article doesn't give me any cause to think this is notable. Provide independent sources that demonstrate that Economics of Indigence Culture and Behavior, and i'll reconsider. -- Ged UK  13:40, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per all comments above demonstrating this is not a "research term" that has wide enough use to establish WP:Notability.  Cazort (talk) 18:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per Majoreditor, it's poorly written and under-referenced. tedder (talk) 06:07, 16 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.