Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Economies of agglomeration


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —  Za  wl  15:19, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Economies of agglomeration

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sourcing, total essay. Unclear focus. Unclear what kind of agglomeration this even refers to, as agglomeration is a dab page. Couldn't find any sources. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to be a legitimate economic term, running it on Google scholar gives me 6000 results. Article needs referening and also written like an essay. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:59, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, It's a legitimate economic term. Fix the page if you don't like it.dml (talk) 03:00, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:14, 12 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep Written like essay is not valid reason for deletion. Also the vague nomination doesn't statr true state of the article. You claimed it's "unsourced" but that's utterly not true and anybody can verify this. It has 10 valid sources including academic books and print sources. You said you couldn't find any source; although strange, I can believe you, but with pointing that others have found sources and the article has sources, decent sources for that matter. Your claim of unclear focus, this may be slightly true especially if you say "poorly organized" and even then, it is also not valid reason for deletion. It just needs copyedit when willing volunteer come around it. You earlier tagged it for PROD and it was speedily challenged. If you can't fix it leave it for others to fix and that have no deadline. –Ammarpad (talk) 07:38, 14 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.