Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecovangelism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 02:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Ecovangelism

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable. Very few google hits and no academic sources. The article does not quote any refs. It will not not approp to redir to Green Christianity -- Alan Liefting talk 09:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. AR   Argon  09:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Must be some new movement that has not gained enough ground to be reported by reliable sources. Maybe wait a few years.--Alasdair 09:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems to be a little used neologism. -- Alan Liefting talk 19:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Wikipedia also has more than enough non-notable neo-pagan spam. --Hornet35 10:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unless this meme spreads and attracts reliable sources, it doesn't warrant its own page. Spellcast 11:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete- there do seem to be sources, but most of them seem to be copied from the same unreliable places/be by the same person. I'm honestly not convinced. J Milburn 12:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.