Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecovision


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 02:09, 10 July 2018 (UTC)

Ecovision

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional, poorly sourced article about a non-notable company. Probably covert advertising, given edit history and creation by SPA. MER-C 16:59, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. Yet another example of a promotional article created and maintained by SPA's Lyndaship (talk) 18:46, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 19:40, 2 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete: An article setting out a company's wares. The text says nothing about the 2014 Advertising Standards Authority adjudication regarding Hassle Free Boilers, but even if that were to be added it would not be evidence of encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. AllyD (talk) 06:18, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH \\\Septrillion:- &#8237;  10 Eleventeen 07:55, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Does not seem to meet notability and this looks an attempt at using Wikipedia for promotion. Dunarc (talk) 22:52, 9 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.