Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecstasy (2010 film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  17:14, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Ecstasy (2010 film)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Self promotional article (original author was the writer) about a non-notable future film... fails WP:CRYSTAL, as well as WP:NFF, WP:V, and WP:COI... Adolphus79 (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - this one doesn't even make IMDB! Blatant self-promotion. --Tris2000 (talk) 14:05, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Why are people using Wiki as a tool to promote their projects?--WngLdr34 (talk) 15:17, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Yeah, why are people using Wikipedia to promote their projects? COUGH JBsupreme (talk) 15:20, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - this movie features Charley Bewley of Twilight, which many readers would be interested in seeing his new projects —Preceding unsigned comment added by Raymondlaw (talk • contribs) 17:39, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Raymond, we are not a mechanism for promotion and advertising, nor are we a fan site for Mr. Bewley or any actor in any film. A blurb in Mr. Bewley's article about this is warranted, but not this article at this time. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: The above editor Raymondlaw created this article. Raymond Law is the producer and co-writer of the film. The fact that Raymond Law is the producer and co-writer was removed from the article by IP user 76.94.129.138 fifty minutes after the article was tagged for Conflict of interest. In this edit on another AfD discussion Raymondlaw referred to an edit by 76.94.129.138 in the first person, implying that 76.94.129.138 is Raymonlaw; this suggests that the removal of COI information may have been done by Raymondlaw. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:24, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: See this sockpuppet report for confirmation of this. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:50, 5 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 17:34, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - another spam by User:Raymondlaw for a non-notable work in progress. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  17:47, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Film with no current notability.  No prejudice to recreation if it becomes notable per WP:FILM. -- Dennis The Tiger   (Rawr and stuff) 19:41, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this film. Joe Chill (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence of notability. No coverage. Even what the author of the article chose to call the "Official ECSTASY Website" is just a Facebook account (though the fact was hidden by giving an indirect link which redirected to FaceBook.) JamesBWatson (talk) 12:31, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice and allow back if and when WP:NF can be met. MichaelQSchmidt (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.