Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ecuador–Malaysia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  ·Add§hore·  T alk T o M e ! 13:57, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Ecuador–Malaysia relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. another seemingly random combination. if the best they can do is $15 million of trade, that is tiny compared to Malaysia's GDP of $279 billion. being both part of the 120 country Non-Aligned Movement adds nothing to notability. LibStar (talk) 06:33, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ecuador-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 07:15, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. This kind of thing should be started off in the Foreign Relations of X article, and only split out once there's some substantive content. Nick-D (talk) 07:22, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and common sense. הסרפד  (call me Hasirpad) (formerly R——bo) 14:03, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.