Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Alleyne-Johnson (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Overall, this hinges on whether it is sufficient to meet WP:MUSICBIO, and so far there has not been an agreement. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 23:35, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Ed Alleyne-Johnson
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Administrative listing per Deletion review/Log/2014 May 15 -- RoySmith (talk) 23:30, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:MUSICBIO.-- Laun  chba  ller  23:36, 22 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep per Launchballer - ( Ignoring the admin above - I see no valid reason for nominating/deleting!} - AFD's aren't used as clean up solutions so I suggest the previous nominator should WP:FIXIT. →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  02:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Please read the deletion review discussion cited above for why this was nominated. -- RoySmith (talk) 02:44, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I had read it hence the above comment, I put "Ignoring the admin above" because I didn't want anyone thinking I was ranting at you but I assume I've slightly offended you which I apologize for - Most certainly not my intention, →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  14:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not offended. Just wanted to make sure everybody understood my (non) role in this AfD.  -- RoySmith (talk) 22:04, 31 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment from Review Nominator - I requested the the review of the deletion and have just written to Roy. I am pleased that the page has been restored for reconsideration. I will rebuild the page over the next couple of weeks to more accurately portray the artist. Comments on the new page as it builds up would be welcome.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to New Model Army (band), of which he was a member. The "Career" section of the band's article includes two sentences on Alleyne-Johnson's involvement with the group as well as his charting solo album. Despite technically meeting criterion 2 of WP:MUSICBIO, that demonstrates only that he "may be notable"; I'm not convinced that a standalone article is needed given the info contained within the reasonable redirect target page, and that I can find no non-trivial coverage in reliable sources for him or his solo works/performances.  Gongshow   talk  02:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Update from Review nominator 08:47, 23 May 2014 (UTC) - I reviewed, reformatted and updated the article today. Jamiller63 (talk) 15:31, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Not bad... but where are your sources?-- Laun  chba  ller  15:39, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Source - I got much of the information from sleeve notes to the latest released album. I understand that this information is considered to be a reliable source and I will note it within the article at an appropriate point.  I'm learning and need to work out where it should go to ensure that it is transparent to people who view the page. Jamiller63 (talk) 20:18, 28 May 2014 (UTC)


 * keep Meets a SNG and there is enough verifiable material to have an article. Hobit (talk) 23:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Redirect to New Model Army (band). He meets WP:MUSIC, but only in a purely technical capacity which I think does not meet the spirit of that guideline.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 02:46, 31 May 2014 (UTC).
 * Keep per and   ♥ Solarra ♥  ♪ 話 ♪  ߷  ♀ 投稿 ♀ 13:14, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I'm not sure what per RoySmith means in this context. My role in this AfD was purely administrative.  I offer no opinion on the outcome.  -- RoySmith (talk) 14:11, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.