Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Chapman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Wizardman 03:33, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Ed Chapman

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Subject would appear not to meet the WP:Notability criteria. Article also violated WP:BLP by containing trivial information and lacks any sources or references to cite any facts in the article. Ozgod 13:01, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete With all the crazy statements in the article, the lack of references is a deal-breaker. Shalom Hello 13:32, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions.   -- John Vandenberg 17:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. No references, non-notable. Freshacconci 17:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless references can be found for the claims in the first paragraph.DGG
 * Delete, per above Modernist 14:20, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete he is not notable. Acalamari 01:46, 29 June 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.