Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Hardy Vodka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 13:24, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Ed Hardy Vodka

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Unfinished nomination. Once again I'm the  ONLY PERSON ON THE WHOLE WIKI   who can fix a freaking redlinked nom. Tagged as possible copyvio, questionable notability. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 17:41, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Hammer, do you want a cookie for your efforts? The life of an editor.  Boo hoo!  I'm sure you'll get over it.   Mr. C.C. Hey yo!I didn't do it! 19:45, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * And I'll bring the Ed Hardy vodka to go along with the cookie. I'll confess, I get really irritated when I see the words "this article's entry" in bright red within the "this article has been nominated" box.  Most of us like to at least read the article before we offer our two cents worth, and we take it for granted that we'll dash over there and then come right back to the discussion.  If it's properly linked, no problem.  But if it's a red link, you get over there, read the article, you say "Yeah, this is crap, this really has got to go, I'll just click here and go back to the discussion and... what the fuck?!!!  Just for that, I'm going to vote to keep it..."  Mandsford (talk) 13:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)


 * delete. No sources available. NN. -- Quiddity (talk) 19:52, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per WP:CSD. No indication of notability. Armbrust  Talk  Contribs  22:08, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom (excluding the brief rant). -- Nuujinn (talk) 00:11, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.