Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Hula III


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's vandalproof page &#x260E;  ) 20:37, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Ed Hula III
Probable vanity page. This "scholar of some repute" is a student; the "Ed Hula" who gets a lot of Google hits seems to be another member of the family. --rbrwr&plusmn; 19:04, 24 October 2005 (UTC)


 * Although he might be a student, his work in his respective fields has garnered him attention and accolades. This was not put up by Ed Hula III and this one reason is hardly sound, in my opinion, to remove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.219.112.66 (talk • contribs) 19:34, 24 October 2005
 * Feel free to show us some accolades; give us something that we can verify, and we might actually have an article here. I'm happy to be proved wrong. As it is we just have a magnet for vandalism, presumably by his classmates. By the way, you deleted half my comment. I've restored it. --rbrwr&plusmn; 20:37, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, nn bio. MCB 20:46, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Wow, you want to delete something because a possible family member has a lot of google hits? I am sorry you are not succesful enough at something worthwile. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.61.23.75 (talk • contribs)
 * My point was that "ed hula" gets a certain number of Google hits, and they aren't about this person. --rbrwr&plusmn; 19:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This article is a clearly non-notable and likely autobiographical work by a student with an extensive vocabulary and ego. Traceroutes on the unsigned comment and the original page creator terminate in Atlanta (Georgia State). CommonerG (talk)
 * This Ed kid is a douche bag. He has not done anything reputable.  He knows how to use a thesaurus and sends long stupid e-mails to the GT Rugby e-mail list that none of us read because he is a moron.  For someone that supposedly lived and played rugby in Australia, 1. he knows surprisingly little about the game, 2. didn't even have the basic gear at the first several practices, and 3. isn't very good at what parts of the game he does know.  Unless you would like to read the very candid opinions of the rugby team (and other large groups of people that Ed has annoyed) I would say delete this entry and forbid Ed from ever accessing this site again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.51.28 (talk • contribs)
 * For the record this anon then made this entertaining edit to Ed Hula III. I reverted it, but given that I can find almost nothing on the web about Mr Hula, I have no idea whether either version has any truth to it. Please, people, bring us some references. --rbrwr&plusmn; 19:24, 25 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I think he has done some reputable things deserving accolades and will get more. Even though he goes to state I still think he deserves an autobiographical entry up here. Is there another Ed Hula III that wants his information on instead of this one? Is Ed Hula III a contested definition? do ya'll spend your day looking for people's autobiographys to say they are pathetic delete them? I say delete ya'll, you don't do anything worthwhile at all but sit at a computer, geek (and this is coming from a georgia tech kid) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.61.68.29 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.