Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Oxenbould (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:29, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Ed Oxenbould
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not a notable actor. Previous AFD resulted in deletion JDDJS (talk) 03:33, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. Previous article was deleted last February for WP:TOO SOON, with several saying he will probably be notable when the Alexander film is released.  Film has been released.  Stories on him by the 'LA Times', 'USA Today', Salt Lake Tribune', 'Toronto Sun', and many others.  Oxenbould clear passes GNG now.  Bgwhite (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep, per Bgwhite. Actor is notable enough now, has a great coverage. -- Captain Assassin! «T ♦ C ♦ G» 03:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - yeah, the result there was the right one but the situation has changed since, allowing the subject to now pass WP:GNG and probably WP:NACTOR.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 04:15, 16 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn No point in dragging this out. It's clear that the consensus is that he's notable now. JDDJS (talk) 15:59, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:09, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.