Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Thompson (Photographer)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:34, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Ed Thompson (Photographer)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to be non notable. Nothing in there which makes him unique. Just like anyother photographer. GAtechnical (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Given the sources in the article he is a notable photographer here in the U.K. Many of the notes are from prominant U.K institutions including Bishopsgate Institute. He's given lectures and had photographic work feautured in the big U.K photo-festivals and photo-features in National Geographic Magazine amongst others. I've also just found out he was in a Channel Four (U.K) television series on photography in the U.K Picture This (Channel 4) and have just added that to the article. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shootographer (talk • contribs) 15:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. LlamaAl (talk) 17:59, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Theopolisme   ( talk )  23:14, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, LlamaAl (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. I can see how an argument could be made for notability, but on closer examination the sourcing is relatively poor (most include his work or are photoessays by him, but do not give reliable info). Does not meet WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE.   dci  &#124;  TALK   01:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Poorly sourced, promotional and non-notable. Fails WP:ARTIST notability guidelines. - MrX 02:14, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.