Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ed Tullett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:05, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Ed Tullett

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm unable to find significant coverage in reliable sources for this person; does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO at this time.  Gongshow  Talk 02:02, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * I am also nominating the following related pages: an album, EP, and split single, respectively.
 *  Gongshow  Talk 02:07, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 02:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 02:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 02:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  Gongshow  Talk 02:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Weak keep There is some third-party coverage out there however, the artist's work has not charted or otherwise received significant third-party coverage. While I am not familiar with the "moody punk" genre or whatever this is and I can't tell if he is the Jimmy Hendrix of that or whatever, if we follow WP:MUSICBIO#1 to the letter then this would definitely be a keep. § FreeRangeFrog  21:54, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Getting some blog/webzine coverage but not yet encyclopedia-worthy. --Michig (talk) 22:09, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep He supported Tegan & Sara very recently. Also, according to WP:MUSICBIO#1 it should not be deleted as his music is released; debut album due for worldwide release soon. He is signed and has a cult fan base. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.192.121 (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2012 (UTC) — 86.6.192.121 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * WP:MUSICBIO #1 is "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.", not "has released music and has fans". --Michig (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * KEEP It seems you've missed the fact that his records have also been released completely independently from him; one by MTV and the other by Equal Vision Records - a big label where over half of its signed artists have Wikipedia pages themselves. — 86.6.192.121 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. The preceding unsigned comment was added at 01:36, 18 November 2012 (UTC).
 * Please note that editors are free to comment as often as they like, but it is not necessary to !vote more than once (see WP:NOTVOTE).  Gongshow  Talk 03:01, 18 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:08, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Changing my !vote to delete at this time. I was unable to find anything more on the artist and I don't believe he meets WP:ARTIST at this point. No prejudice to recreation of bio when and if he does - this might be a classic case of WP:TOOSOON. § FreeRangeFrog 18:31, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.