Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Love and the Lovers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 18:21, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Eddie Love and the Lovers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Orphaned band article in which no other references other than the book as a citation and may not be considered notable. Also not mentioned on garage rock and may turn out to be a hoax. The Snowager -is awake  21:09, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * This isn't an orphan, it's on a list and as such it has an incoming link and I've deOrphaned it. I didn't know online sources are required for articles, is http://www.naturalgeographicmagazine.com/q/Eddie%20Love%20and%20the%20Lovers not considered reliable? I'd have thought Natural Geographic Magazine would be. 3gg5amp1e (talk) 02:09, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:22, 30 April 2015 (UTC)


 * The content at the Natural Geographic link (not to be confused with National Geographic) is taken from Wikipedia and so is not reliable. Everymorning   talk  03:30, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No evidence of coverage in reliable independent sources (coverage online consists mainly of an Amazon review and Wikipedia mirrors and there are no Google Books hits). Thus, this appears to be either a hoax or unverifiable; either way it has no place here. Everymorning   talk  00:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:GNG. I think "Natural Geographic" chose that name so people would confuse it with the real magazine...? Elgatodegato (talk) 01:57, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.