Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Osborne


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory  (u • t • c) 01:12, 5 April 2018 (UTC)

Eddie Osborne

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not sure why the group nom of Newark City Council members didn't include the lot, but in any case this fellow got missed, and as a local politician with no claim to notability beyond his position, and nothing beyond routine electoral info, I don't see the notability. Mangoe (talk) 22:17, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions.  MT Train Talk 02:56, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete- fails WP:POLITICIAN. I didn't forget this, but didn't nominate it with the others to try to avoid wikilawyering that I was afraid would happen since he is elected at-large as opposed to by a ward. In my mind this makes no difference and I should have just bundled it anyway since the wikilawyering about the bundle that I hoped to avoid is going on anyway (even though all those are membersof the same city council elected in the same way).--Rusf10 (talk) 23:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I just nominated the rest of them see Articles for deletion/Mildred C. Crump & Articles for deletion/Carlos M. Gonzalez (2nd nomination)--Rusf10 (talk) 23:19, 29 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. City councillors are not automatically deemed to pass WP:NPOL just because they exist, the way state or federal legislators are — to be eligible for an article, a city councillor must either (a) serve on the city council of an internationally prominent global city on the order of New York City, Chicago, Los Angeles, Toronto or London, or (b) be reliably sourceable to a depth and volume and range of media coverage that plainly marks them out as significantly more notable than most other city councillors in most other cities. Newark is not a city that gets its councillors in the door under condition A, however — so its councillors would have to satisfy condition B, but the sourcing here does not demonstrate that Eddie Osborne does so. Bearcat (talk) 13:05, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete To a degree, we've used Global city as a proxy for determining whether a city is sufficiently large to presume that notability exists for city councilmembers (note that Gamma-level cities are not seen as large enough). Otherwise, the expectation is that councilmembers are expected to receive significant national or international coverage of their work. --Enos733 (talk) 20:04, 3 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete part of the absurd over-coverage of living New Jersey politicians.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:29, 4 April 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.