Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Paul


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Cbrown1023   talk   18:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Eddie Paul

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability is not established and the article is written more like a publicity release. Of the sources, one is subject's own company, and I doubt the US Patents in themselves confer notability. Author may have WP:COI because inserts references to the subject in other articles. At best, needs reliable third-party sources.  Rodhullandemu  (Talk) 20:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC) Keep, edits will be made soon to comply with guidelines. —Preceding unsigned comment added by C6VETTE (talk • contribs) 19:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, there's actually quite a bit of coverage of his creations for movies as well as private clients. Google News Archive search Needs rewrite to sources and for tone.--Dhartung | Talk 22:52, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, promo/advertising and apparent vanity article. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:41, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep, the fact that the sourcing is coming primarily from pay-per-read sources usually sets off alarm bells in my head, but there's so much of it that I think Mr Paul may meet the "third-party coverage" notability requirement. Lankiveil (speak to me) 11:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.