Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddsworld (3rd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sufficient consensus. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

Eddsworld
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of notability. The article was previously nominated for deletion in 2011 with no consensus and "everyone seems to agree the article needs further improvement". That improvement has not happened, nor is it possible. The lone reliable third-party source given in the article, The Guardian, devotes less than one sentence to Eddsworld. That's not enough to write an article about the show, and other sources I found provided no greater level of detail. Huon (talk) 00:21, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete: As noted in the previous AfD, the vast majority of the sources aren't reliable or passing mentions. The previous AfD mentioned a BBC feature of some sort on this subject, but it doesn't seem to have been provided.  I can't find it in my own searches.  As  points out, the improvements have not happened. Chrisw80 (talk) 00:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to the article about the show's creator at best. This is a great show by a person who unfortunately passed away at a very young age (hope he enjoys having a lot of coke and bacon in heaven), but the notability of the show is very questionable. edtiorEهեইдအ😎 01:06, 27 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.