Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eden: the Deceit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:09, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Eden: the Deceit

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Reach Out to the Truth correctly tagged this as lacking references of any kind almost a decade ago. The Earth has now completed eight revolutions around the Sun and still no sources have materialized. A basic BEFORE (newspapers.com, JSTOR, Google Books, Google News) fails to find any sources. The corresponding entry in Italian isn't much better, boasting only two sources which are both non-RS. Over the course of many, many years every possible opportunity has been extended to salvage this article; it's time to end its suffering. Chetsford (talk) 09:37, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 09:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: One thing the native Italian version of the article does have going for it is that it has a citation to show the game won an award at the Lucca Comics & Games convention. I have no idea of the value of the second source in the Italian version of the article. BOZ (talk) 12:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
 * While this is true, (a) the citation in question is not a reliable source so we must treat it as non-existent, (b) WP:NPRODUCT does not offer us inherent notability for a commercial product winning an award, in the same way we have inherent notability under WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NATHLETE for award receipt, (c) an award at a regional comic book convention is not exactly the Pulitzer Prize or an Olympic Gold Medal or some of the other awards generally envisaged when we imagine inherent notability for a "major award." Chetsford (talk) 18:45, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jovanmilic97 (talk) 09:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete lacks sources completely, fails WP:GNG. SportingFlyer  talk  18:01, 5 December 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.