Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edewcate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The Bushranger One ping only 20:17, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

Edewcate

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Non-notable company, no reliable independent sources, fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. WWGB (talk) 12:58, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * See also Articles for deletion/Satyadev chada


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. WWGB (talk) 13:05, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 13:19, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete. Lacks reliable independent secondary sources to establish notability as required by WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH.  Googling turned up absolutely nothing useful.  Wikipedia is not for WP:PROMOTION.  Msnicki (talk) 15:08, 1 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment. I have created a separate AfD page for Satyadev chada at Articles for deletion/Satyadev chada. Msnicki (talk) 15:22, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator. - Mailer Diablo 10:41, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.