Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edexter


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. De728631 (talk) 12:31, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Edexter

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable (WP:GNG); has not "received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Guoguo12 (Talk)  22:16, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 27 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - software article lacking reliable 3rd party refs to establish notability (refs provided are a personal site/blog and a developer's site). Created by an SPA as possibly promotional.Dialectric (talk) 06:06, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete lack of secondary sources. SalHamton (talk) 18:33, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete as lacking in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources. If in-depth coverage in multiple independent sources is added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 00:15, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.