Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar's fall (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. -- Longhair\talk 18:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Edgar's fall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable Youtube video, has been begging for reliable sources for over a year, survived an AfD several months ago, but nobody has improved this article since then. Corvus cornix talk  22:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, does seem to have significant coverage in Hispanophone media. Search terms: Edgar se cae (Edgar falls, I guess) and la caida de Edgar (Edgar's fall). --Dhartung | Talk 23:26, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, as per Dhartung. Previously nominated for deletion, resulting in a Keep. Why not respect previous concensus? Vicco Lizcano (talk) 19:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC) (Hey! Listen!)
 * Consensus can change. And besides, there are still no reliable sources.   Corvus cornix  talk  23:41, 1 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep. Notable internet/TV phenomenon, at least in Mexico. --Itub (talk) 17:15, 4 February 2008 (UTC) Striking through my !vote. While I think this is a notable web phenomenon, the reliable sources are nowhere to be found. I looked and looked and the best I could find were a couple of links on local newspapers or magazines, plus one TV appearance. There are a gazillion blog posts about it, but unfortunately they are not enough to satisfy the WP:N. --Itub (talk) 18:05, 5 February 2008 (UTC) Ok, so some sources could be found after all. --Itub (talk) 16:52, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
 * transwiki to es.wikipedia. Entirely foreign langage content, foreign langage references. --Salix alba (talk) 11:13, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment What's that, Salix? The article is in English; if we can't cover things in other languages, even the Bible is unworthy of coverage.  Nyttend (talk) 14:28, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a fad, fails WP:N Beach drifter (talk) 21:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ˉˉanetode╦╩ 09:53, 8 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep relevantSuperscoop (talk) 18:31, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep El Universal, La Jornada, and Reforma, Mexico's three biggest newspapers have all talked about it. I added sources from El Universal and La Jornada, but Reforma's a paysite so I didn't add them, here they are though . --Solid Reign (talk) 16:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.