Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar, Dunn & Company


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:51, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Edgar, Dunn & Company

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No evidence of notability, re-created article previously deleted as both a copyvio and and prod. Note restored copyright material has been deleted again MilborneOne (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete per nomination. Another global management consulting company advertising on Wikipedia.  Their actual expertise is apparently in credit card payment processing.  You won't get that clearly from any of the older versions with the copyright violation left in, either.  Possibly an interesting business, if they'd share with us something they actually know we might find a place to at least mention them; but this always has been a vaguely written PR puff piece that manages to ignore their actual strength, and as such doesn't leave many constructive options. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 04:38, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No indication of notability.  Possibly might meet it, but the article has no enclyclopedic content that would be lost if deleted instead of waiting for the possibility of awaiting a real article and evidence of notability. North8000 (talk) 18:43, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - The closest and only thing I found notable was this mention here, but that's simply announcing that they have a new CEO. I didn't see anything else on both Yahoo! and and Google. SwisterTwister   talk  06:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm the author of the article.  I realize that the current form isn't so great, but I'm trying to actually edit the thing so that it's not a copyright violation.  If I can't get the article in line with the other management consulting related articles within the next week, then I'll nominate it for deletion myself.  In the meantime, I'd like to point out that enforcement of Wikipedia rules regarding notability and advertising are pretty inconsistent for the management consulting articles. BowChickaNeowNeow (talk) 13:24, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.