Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgar R. Bassett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to USS Bassett. Consensus that the topic is not notable. Any useful content is preserved in the page history and may be merged into other articles as deemed appropriate. (non-admin closure) (t &#183; c)  buidhe  13:59, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Edgar R. Bassett

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:SOLDIER and WP:GNG as a one-time recipient of the Navy Cross. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Lettlerhello • contribs 16:48, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep A warship was named after him which is a "significant award or honor and so passes WP:ANYBIO. Andrew🐉(talk) 18:50, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Bassett. Fails WP:SOLDIER (Ensign awarded a Navy Cross. Having a ship named after him during WWII is not a "significant award or honor") and WP:GNG. No SIGCOV in multiple RS so not notable. Mztourist (talk) 03:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to USS Bassett. I concur he doesn't meet NBIO/NSOLDIER but there is some mergeable content here (sadly there are next to no inline refs in the article, but we can probably AGF the content...). The ship can have a section about its non-notable namesake.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete having a ship named after you is not a sign of notability when ships are being churned out left and right and there is an odd decision that they must be named after someone.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect and Merge to USS Bassett, it's more appropriate to have relevant information (specifically military career and Navy Cross action) about a ship's namesake in the ship's article than a completely separate article. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:13, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Merge to USS Bassett. Not enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and doesn't meet WP:NSOLDIER, but there is some information which would make a nice addition on the ship article.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:09, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to USS Bassett, fails GNG. Cavalryman (talk) 02:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC).

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northern Escapee (talk) 05:40, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect as not enough coverage. Setreis (talk) 07:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.