Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EdgeRater


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  MBisanz  talk 02:35, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

EdgeRater

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable piece of software, cannot find third party sources. DFS454 (talk) 20:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

It is the target of a link from the FeatureComparison of Technical analysis software table. Some entries in the table are linked to corresponding wikipedia entries, whilst others are not. This entry aids readers of wikipedia by providing the link target. EREmma (talk) 20:46, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS --DFS454 (talk) 21:30, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I was thinking more along the lines of providing endpoints for links rather than the other stuff exists argument. For instance, if looking down the column of the table, half of the entries have blue links and half don't I feel that if you can provide the succinct entry for one of the non-existing links then that is beneficial to Wikipedia users. Still, I bow to the greater good EREmma (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Not notable, no press coverage. Pburka (talk) 22:03, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 'Delete - a complete lack of coverage in any sources -- Whpq (talk) 16:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:05, 27 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  02:54, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, no third-party coverage, vaguely promotional in tone as well. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:20, 27 March 2009 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.