Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgelake Plaza


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:38, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

Edgelake Plaza

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Very non-notable mall in Wisconsin, totally fails WP:RS. Way too small of a mall to have ever been notable.

I am also listing its sister mall, right across the street, for the same reason.



Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 06:37, 22 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tikiwont (talk) 10:52, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete as per nom RMHED (talk) 23:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Malls-related deletions.   — Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 03:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * comment- nomination is flawed, your basing notability upon size, read WP:BIG. Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  04:49, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I'm basing it on WP:RS. The fact that they're two very small malls is immaterial -- I nominated the two malls since there aren't any reliable sources on them, and no assertation of notability. Ten Pound Hammer  • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 06:15, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
 * my apologies, I must be misinterpreting "Way too small of a mall to have ever been notable." Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  06:29, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Vegaswikian 06:20, 2 December 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.