Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgewater Mall


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 12:58, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Edgewater Mall

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

substandard assertion of notability-I lived in Mississippi, the whole of the Gulf Coast can be driven across in less than an hour. Mallcruft. Chris 06:02, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per proposed guideline WP:MALL. Although this mall obviously exists, it's hard to find reliable sources discussing it, as is the case with many other malls. --Metropolitan90 06:35, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Although the WP:MALL page has been tagged "rejected", it had not been rejected at the time I submitted my initial recommendation. --Metropolitan90 19:56, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - Trim this down per WP:NOT and WP:OR and you get..that it exists. Non-notable mall. - Wo o  ty   Woot?   contribs  08:39, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Wiki is not a directory of shops in any given shopping mall. Ohconfucius 09:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per proposed guideline WP:MALL, even thoughj someone has just put a "rejected" tag on that proposal. Seems more like a used and useful guideline. Edison 19:15, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - No independent sources on anything of interest. In any case the list of shops must go; WP is not the Yellow Pages. TerriersFan
 * Delete - Appears to be non-notable, but I may be swayed if some of the claims made (eg re Tulane) can be substantiated. Note that my vote in this instance is not on the basis of the rejected proposal WP:MALL as I believe many malls/shopping centres are indeed notable. Orderinchaos78 10:55, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I worked at this mall.  There was definetly nothing out of the ordinary about it, and yes, the stores have changed over time.  The only thing notable I can think of was that it was damaged by Hurricane Katrina.  However, aerial photographs only show minimal damage to the building's exterior.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.