Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgware Walker


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The argument against deletion did not cite any relevant guideline or policy, nor were the notability concerns adequately addressed. ✗ plicit  12:37, 1 February 2022 (UTC)

Edgware Walker

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I've done some Googling and see no reliable sources, just oblique mentions, chatty mentions or referring to the comedian's video. Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 06:50, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:40, 12 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment someone contacted me to point out this piece from a local paper. Doesn't seem to meet our bar for establishing notability, but wanted reviewers to see it. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 11:41, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 15:46, 19 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – AssumeGoodWraith  (talk | contribs) 11:09, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Please do not delete this article "Edgware Walker". I live in Edgware and have for years, I remember seeing this gentleman, in and around Edgware, many, many times. He was a well known character in Edgware, don't take away any reference to the poor soul. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.158.47.241 (talk) 11:05, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks. Please see WP:BIO. To establish notability, as opposed to 'someone recognisable on the streets of a locality', we need multiple, non-trivial references in reliable source. If you (or anyone else) could provide one or two, the article will not be deleted. --Dweller (talk) Old fashioned is the new thing! 22:35, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete No evidence that complies with GNG or any applicable SNG. This appears to be sourced entirely to one comedian's routine and some personal recollections and speculations.  Eggishorn  (talk) (contrib) 22:20, 30 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.