Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:58, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Edgy

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not appear to be notable. Did a quick search and was not able to find 3rd party sources. Likely WP:COI concerns as well. Should probably be converted back to a redirect to Edge (video game) which was notable with the trademark dispute ( along with other games that used Edge as part of their name ) with Edge Games. PaleAqua (talk) 21:07, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I've added links to external sources. Does this help? Stevenbird (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 18:46, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The first does not seem to mention Edgy, the second one only has a link to the home page for Edgy, further they appear to be WP:Primary sources. To establish notability secondary sources would be needed. PaleAqua (talk) 04:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   03:33, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete Article fails to establish notability to meet WP:GNG. Possibly a WP:SOAPBOX case. -- Chamith   (talk)  09:51, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - And I recommend some kind of note being added to the top of the Edge (video game) article to the Wiktionary page on being 'edgy' in case searchers are confused, since they probably either want the game or the general concept. CoffeeWithMarkets (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Edgy is the programming language being used in the high school curriculum developed by the Victorian Curriculum Assessment Authority, and offered state-wide in Victoria, Australia. I am trying to find more sources. Stevenbird (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:03, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - with no prejudice for resubmission, if the article can be rewritten with better sources. I couldn't find any. Might be a case of WP:TOOSOON.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.