Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edgy Women


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. After sources were uncovered, consensus appears to have shifted to keep. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 20:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)

Edgy Women

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Questionably notable and improvable as the best my searches found were this, this and this. Pinging, , and. SwisterTwister  talk  23:18, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  23:21, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete From a bit more searching, it seems likely this annual performance exists.  But I see no evidence of notability.  Also notice there's no French-language version of the page, and the orphan tag has remained unaddressed for many years now.  --Lockley (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - I copy edited this without investigating its notability at the time, and I can't see anything beyond mentions of its existence. —Torchiest talkedits 00:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - thanks for the ping, but I have no clue. Bearian (talk) 01:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Ditto - no stake in this one. --LilHelpa (talk) 22:20, 15 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Seems to get coverage in reliable sources, though many of them are French-language:, , , , , etc.  If I felt that my French skills were better, I'd expand the article, but I can barely understand these articles.  Google Translate helps, but it's still difficult to get the nuance.  I suggest searching French-language newspapers, such as Le Devoir and La Presse, which is where I found most of this coverage.  There were also some hits from student newspapers, which I disregarded as unreliable. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:03, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jenks24 (talk) 13:32, 22 October 2015 (UTC)
 * delete - poor sources, non-notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 18:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC) struck out !vote by confirmed, now blocked, sockpuppet.  Onel 5969  TT me 20:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * I posted five sourced above. I can't help but notice that you are a brand new user who discovered AfD on the very day your account was created. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep – Clearly passes WP:GNG as per the sources posted above by NinjaRobotPirate, and as per more sources I found:, , , , , , , , . North America1000 01:19, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * On a second look, I'd say keep per WP:HEY, based on sources found by . Bearian (talk) 20:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.