Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edie Bukewihge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   '''delete. Candidacy does not ensure notability.'''. - Philippe 19:27, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Edie Bukewihge

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable person. Seems like promotional vanity. Was deleted a few weeks ago as an expired prod. Username screams COI here. - Warthog Demon  03:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note - It seems it IS her, according to the comment at Talk:Edie Bukewihge. - Warthog Demon  03:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * What he said. Delete Baseball Bugs What's up, Doc? 03:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article itself says she's non-notable: "Virtually considered a little-unknown, she campaigned with little support..." and lost the nomination. Clarityfiend (talk) 04:05, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Mere candidacy for public office does not confer notability on the candidate. I didn't see any other assertion of notability in the article. Townlake (talk) 05:06, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, and the article itself, I guess. Maxamegalon2000 05:18, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete There is not a single source in this article I am suprised that its not being speidly deleated! CelesJalee (talk) 05:21, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Note - Thank you all for your input, and impeccable notes of interest. I, Edie Bukewihge am impressed to see the participation here. I have had the pleasure of being in Wikipedia at the hands of others for over six years now, and somehow was deleted. Thank you for the responses, I am new at posting on Wikipedia for the moment, in order for anyone that is searching to find and scrutinize whatever is available on my person. When I looked to see what was new, I realized I had been deleted and I was not as concern of the deletion, but questioned why. I am learning about the terms 'newbie mistakes and prod' - but no matter, most candidates win or lose, seem to enjoy the benefits of those searching to know a bit about them pro or con, and will make certain monetary contributions to Wikipedia for their brilliant participation of the art. I appreciate your input, and wish you well on your ventures as well. Looking forward to our interactions. Sincerely, Edie —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.200.231.221 (talk) 07:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  17:48, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete my head hurts. JuJube (talk) 09:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.