Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Edifecs Inc.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. czar ⨹   23:24, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Edifecs Inc.

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Borderline notability, article mainly devoted to praising thecompany  DGG ( talk ) 22:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 23:15, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 23:16, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - Does not pass Notability (organizations and companies):the topic has not been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources. The coverage referenced in this article is not significant; it's largely lists. Also, wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion. -  t u coxn \talk 23:08, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete, almost qualifies to be speedied as spam. (It was even worse before someone removed all the external link spam.) In a search I found only press releases and a little hyperlocal coverage. --MelanieN (talk) 01:40, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.